Costly and risky Generative AI projects flop

The Grim Reality of AI Projects: High Costs and Low Success Rates

Artificial intelligence (AI) has long been hailed as a technology that will revolutionize industries. However, recent reports paint a less than optimistic picture, with rising costs and mounting risks leading many AI projects to falter.

The Harsh Truth: AI Projects Abandoned at Alarming Rates

According to a new Gartner report, about 30% of generative AI projects are abandoned after the proof-of-concept stage by the end of 2025. Companies are facing challenges in proving and realizing value from these endeavors, which can cost anywhere from $5 million to $20 million in upfront investments. Similarly, a Deloitte report revealed that 70% of surveyed companies have only moved a fraction of their GenAI experiments into the production stage, citing lack of preparation and data-related issues as key reasons for the low success rate.

The Bleak Landscape of AI Project Failures

Research from the RAND think tank highlighted a staggering statistic — over 80% of AI projects fail, a rate twice as high as non-AI corporate IT projects. This failure rate is reflected in the financial realm, as evidenced by a significant market decline that saw tech giants like NVIDIA, Meta, Alphabet, and others losing a combined $1.3 trillion in shares over just five days.

See also  Robotic tech in hip surgery lowers infection risk

The Costly Investment Needed for GenAI Projects

Deploying generative AI projects requires substantial financial investment. Gartner estimates that using a GenAI API could entail upfront costs of up to $200,000 and an additional $550 per user annually. Custom model development can be even costlier, ranging from $5 million to $20 million upfront, with additional annual user costs ranging from $8,000 to $21,000. Despite these high costs, global IT leaders are increasing their AI investments, with concerns lingering about the substantial financial outlay and the delayed returns on investment that GenAI projects often entail.

The Role of Preparation and Data Quality in Project Success

One common culprit behind the failure of enterprise GenAI projects is a lack of preparedness. Deloitte’s survey revealed that fewer than half of organizations felt adequately prepared in crucial areas such as technology infrastructure, data management, talent acquisition, and risk management. Quality data is also a major hurdle, with many businesses avoiding certain AI use cases due to data-related issues like sensitivity and privacy concerns.

The Persistence of Businesses Despite Challenges

Despite the daunting statistics, businesses are forging ahead with their GenAI initiatives. Reports indicate that a majority of U.S.-based CIOs are actively deploying GenAI copilots, with chatbot agents being a popular implementation. Additionally, the tangible impacts on revenue savings and productivity are driving continued investment in AI projects, with many companies reporting early positive outcomes.

While concerns about falling behind in AI adoption persist, organizations must navigate the maze of challenges in order to reap the potential benefits that cutting-edge technology like GenAI offers.

See also  Navigating future drone tech: Regulatory challenges in 2024