In the intricate landscape of the Malayalam film industry, the setup of committees has become a recurring theme. These committees often carry the promise of change and progress, but their effectiveness remains a topic of debate. This article delves into the history, controversies, and complexities surrounding these committees within the Malayalam film industry.
Unraveling the Committee Conundrum
Purpose and Perception
Setting up committees is a dual-edged sword; they can serve as a beacon of guidance to solve issues or become a cushion to delay actions. In the case of Kerala, the Malayalam film fraternity is grappling with the intent behind a State government-initiated committee tasked with drafting a film policy. Controversy emerged as industry stakeholders criticized the unilateral constitution of the committee without their consultation.
Controversy and Chaos
The controversy escalated when committee members claimed lack of prior consultation before their inclusion. Renowned figures like filmmaker Rajeev Ravi and actor Manju Warrier even declined participation due to other commitments. The committee, led by filmmaker Shaji N. Karun, Chairman of the Kerala State Film Development Corporation (KSFDC), was established as per a Department of Cultural Affairs order on July 15.
Questionable Appointments
Shaji N. Karun’s appointment to lead the committee raised eyebrows, especially considering the criticism faced by KSFDC for its handling of government-backed projects for women filmmakers and marginalized communities. The treatment of filmmakers, causing distress and delays, has come under scrutiny. This backdrop intensifies concerns about the committee’s effectiveness.
The Shadow of the Hema Committee
The film policy committee’s scope includes addressing issues of sexual harassment and gender inequality in the Malayalam film industry. It refers to the Hema Committee report, which reignites questions about the government’s reluctance to make the report public or take action, three and a half years after its submission. The Hema Committee was established in the aftermath of the actor assault case and addressed pressing gender-related concerns.
Delayed Action and Suspicions
The government formed another committee in 2022 to study the Hema Committee report, but it has not convened or acted upon its recommendations. This context prompts speculation about whether the recent committee aims to provide an exit route for the government without releasing the Hema Committee report. The report contains testimonies of harassment faced by women in the industry, implying the potential downfall of influential figures.
Evolution of Film Committees in India
The Indian film industry’s relationship with committees dates back to the pre-Independence era. The Indian Cinematograph committee of 1927 focused on film censorship. However, recommendations for supporting the industry were sidelined due to financial implications. Post-Independence, the Film Enquiry committee proposed measures to develop cinema as a medium of education and entertainment. It yielded invaluable insights into the state of the industry.
Committees and Cinema in Kerala
In Kerala, KSFDC was established in 1975 to nurture Malayalam cinema within the state. Over time, it supported meaningful cinema and played a role in nurturing filmmakers through exposure to international films. Various committees, like the Adoor Gopalakrishnan-led committee, recommended improvements in film promotion and funding.
Challenges Persist
Despite efforts, challenges persisted. The Chalachithra Academy suggested an Internal Complaint Committee (ICC) to address sexual harassment, but adoption has been limited. Amidst this landscape, concerns are raised about the effectiveness of the latest committee, evoking doubts about its potential impact and whether it will lead to meaningful action.
The Road Ahead
As the Malayalam film industry navigates the maze of committees, the onus lies on concrete action and meaningful change. The history of committees highlights instances of both success and missed opportunities. With the industry evolving and technology shaping filmmaking, the future calls for a comprehensive approach that goes beyond the comfort of committees.